June '12 - Arrogant evolutionists.
argued this many times on Youtube, Blogspot
and forums so I thought I'd summarise my
theory of evolution wasn't something I
questioned before because the alternative
theory is total nonsense, but after
witnessing the total arrogance of a lot of
scientists talking about evolution it makes
me wonder if it's really a scientific theory
or another form of religion.
that is scientific has to be true, it can't
be open to interpretation or opinion, it is
either correct or false. But a lot of the
evolution scientists preach the theory as
though they're trying to convince people
based upon belief rather than facts.
problem I have with evolution is that every
counter argument is also concidered proof as
evolution, so no matter what strange animals
exist in the world there is always the same
reason for them to be. I'm not sure if I've
explained that right so here are some
men have nipples? An evolutionist would
explain how babies develop in the womb in a
certain order and the nipples are developed
before the rest of the sexual organs. This is
concidered proof that evolution is real
because a creator would never design babies
in that way. What if in our culture men used
their nipples to 'breast-feed' a baby in
order to comfort him/her. Then the
evolutionist would say that evolution gave
men nipples in order to help bring up
children, and children are more likely to
survive with two parents looking after them.
But what if men didn't have nipples at all?
An evolutionist would say men don't have
nipples because they are not needed so
therefore this is proof that evolution is
words it makes no difference if men have
nipples or not, it always leads to the
argument that evolution is real. Completely
different facts, even hypothetical made up
ones, lead to the same conclusion. But isn't
this what creationists have been doing?
lizard is green and lives in a tree then the
reason why it is coloured green is to
camouflage it so it will be safe from
predators. But if a lizard is bright orange
and lives in a tree then it is coloured that
way in order to attract a mate. In other
words it can be any colour and still be
considered as proof that evolution is real.
myself thinking that the theory of evolution
started out as a genuine scientific study
that has turned into a form of religion in
its own right. If you dare to even question
it you'll get branded a religious nutter.
posted a message on a forum questioning how
age-span can be passed onto the next
generation. It was my first post and was a
geninue question that I wanted to know the
answer to. I was told I was so retarded that
it was a wonder I could dress myself in the
<<< Main Page